Crip Technoscience Issue

Catalyst has published a special CRIP TECHNOSCIENCE issue, a must read for Tech&Dis-interested folks. I’ve been waiting for the Fritsch-Hamraie “Crip Technoscience Manifesto” to come out for over a year.

I might also draw your attention to a book review of Bodyminds Reimagined by Sami Schalk, written by STS PhD Candidate Joshua Earle. (More work to come from him around the theme of CYBORG MAINTENANCE soon, will share when published.)

Also, I’d like to draw your attention to ALL the articles because wow, but it will be obnoxious if I try to. Here’s just a list, but you could also click here.

  • Introduction to Special Section on Crip Technoscience by (guest editors) Kelly Fritsch, Aimi Hamraie, Mara Mills, David Serlin
  • Crip Technoscience Manifesto by Aimi Hamraie, Kelly Fritsch
  • Crip Kin, Manifesting by Alison Kafer
  • Continuing Presence of Discarded Bodies: Occupational Harm, Necro-Activism, and Living Justice by Eunjung Kim
  • Cyberpunk’s Other Hackers: The Girls Who Were Plugged In by Lindsey Dolich Felt
  • Materializing Datafied Body Doubles: Insulin Pumps, Blood Glucose Testing, and the Production of Usable Bodies by Stephen Horrocks
  • Technopsyence and Afro-Surrealism’s Cripistemologies by Olivia Banner
  • Transmobility: Possibilities in Cyborg (Cripborg) Bodies by Mallory Kay Nelson, Ashley Shew (your fave), Bethany Stevens
  • Introduction to Crip Technoscience Roundtable by Aimi Hamraie
  • How Technology Is Forcing the Disability Rights Movement into the 21st Century by Vilissa Thompson (check out her Ramp Your Voice blog too)
  • Technologies for New Nightlife by Kevin Gotkin
  • Cultural, Aesthetic Disability Technoscience by Alice Sheppard
  • The Rise and Fall of the Plastic Straw: Sucking in Crip Defiance by Alice Wong
  • Lab Meeting: Transcription Work and the Practices of Crip Technoscience by Louise Hickman
  • Temporal Orders and Y Chromosome Futures: Of Mice, Monkeys, and Men by Sam Taylor-Alex, Sharyn Davies
  • Amazon Echo and the Aesthetics of Whiteness by Thao Phan
  • Fables of Response-ability: Feminist Science Studies as Didactic Literature by Martha Kenney
  • Look Up and Smile! Seeing through Alexa’s Algorithmic Gaze by Nassim Parvin

I will be using this articles for a long time in Tech & Dis class in future iterations!

Curiosity: Vancouver’s Straw Ban – Another Barrier and Another Excuse For Non-Disabled People to Shame, Marginalize, Interrogate and Demonstrate They Don’t Care About Discrimination Against Disabled People

mssinenomineblog

Screen Shot 2018-05-31 at 2.09.06 PM.pngScreen shot of linked article: Headline – Vancouver to be first major Canadian city to ban plastic straws

On May 16, 2018, the City of Vancouver, BC voted unanimously to proceed with a ban on single-use plastic straws. They did so despite the fact they are necessary for some disabled people and that alternatives (metal, paper, bamboo…) are not suitable for different reasons for different disabled people.

 

The City had originally planned to ban other items, such as single-use plastic utensils but after concerns were raised during consultation, that was changed to opt in – meaning provided only if requested by the customer. In contrast, as a result of consultation the opt-in for plastic straws was changed to a ban in part because “staff concluded that a customer prompt or by-request by-law was not practical…”

Months earlier the City’s Park Board had voted 5-2 against banning balloons…

View original post 4,285 more words

Disabled People in Space – Becoming Interplanetary

A note: I had the great pleasure of participating in a panel discussion as part of the Becoming Interplanetary Event at the Kluge Center of the Library of Congress I’m still buzzing from the amazing range of new ideas and cool stuff that this meant. The event consisted of 3 panels and 3 performances. The amazing Lucianne Walkowicz organized the event – an event that’s even hard to describe. Below, I’m adding some notes – marked up with links out – that I brought with me to the panel. “The Right Stuff” asked (well, Lucianne actually did the asking!) panelists Brenda Child, Brian Nord, Chanda Prescod-Weinstein, and I about who has the right stuff for becoming interplanetary, how narratives shape these ideas about space, and how the meaning of what stuff is right is evolving or being challenged. (I will link here when the captioned session hits the interwebs.)

Personal Background: I work on narratives from the disability community that challenge our usual notions about technology and body – specifically I am interested in the idea of technoableism. (I have written a bit on this topic of Logic Magazine earlier this year.)

Technoableism is the idea that our narratives about technology and disability often reinforce ableism, though they are often dressed up in the language of empowerment. We talk about fixing people and giving them (disabled people) new powers with technology – often in the absence of consulting those same folks about what they might actually want and how they think about their bodies.

Specific to thinking about The Right Stuff and participating in this panel, I’ve been thinking in 3 different veins, though I didn’t list them this way at the panel:

  1. Historical Prelude: Including disabled and Deaf people in space research has already happened – but with our bodies being seen as useful for research purpose only without considering people in our communities as candidates with “the right stuff.”
    • Read about the Gallaudet 11: Deaf men were recruited by NASA from Gallaudet University for training around motion sickness in space since some types of deafness correspond to difference in the feeling of motion sickness. Despite superior performance when it comes to not getting motion sick, these research subjects weren’t recruits for actual space travel. They were as a reference class to get findings to help hearing people go to space.
  2. Contemporary Artistic Reflection: Artistic and creative work on #CripsInSpace in the Deaf Poets Society and other disability narratives, poems, and memoir that reflect on space offer reasons to think that the adaptability, creativity, and spatial and planning prep that disabled people already engage in could provide good reason for opening space exploration to us. Here are some links related to #CripsInSpace
  3. Everyone in space will be disabled, if they are not yet already. And people might want to be disabled to be in space. Examples include:
    • Wheelchair Users & Movement in Space: CripsInSpace and Sam de Leve have pointed out how wheelchair users and other mobility device users are often use to figuring out how to navigate spaces in a more creative way that involves a lot of pushing off in ways that nondisabled people rarely experience. (As a person who loves her rollator, I can confirm that the beauty of pushing off an moving in this way is wonderful – and something you get better at doing the more time you spend on wheels.)
    • Some medical conditions being better: People with certain medical conditions might make better space travellers under particular conditions, either because they’d do better in lower gravity or because their bodies can tolerate high g’s. For instance, people with hearts closer to their brains are less likely to pass out in high g’s since blood can make it to the brain faster. People with some bone conditions might do better where their skeleton is less compressed by gravity over time. (In individual conversations with folks, it’s always surprising to me how many people have thought about how their bodies would do in space!)
    • It’s not just physical disability, though: Mental health in space: We already know that Seasonal Affective Disorder has higher incidence in places where people get less light from the sun. Imagine the high incidence of SAD we might see from people travelling away from the Earth. It might make sense to send people who have already learned how to manage their mental health here on Earth if we hope for good space travellers who have a track record of learning and adapting to various conditions already.
    • Cyborgs/Cripborgs* wanted — there are many examples of people who have medical devices and monitors installed that would make it easier to do some things in space. My fave example is from my pal Mallory Kay Nelson: people with ostomy bags will have a much easier time with the current pooping in lower gravity situation. Read about the history of pooping in space while you consider this.
    • Even if we aren’t sending disabled people out, we’ll be bringing disabled people home or sending them further out. We’ll have new disabilities in space, and people who are nondisabled here will become disabled through the environmental changes in space – gravity and radiation being the two most anticipated, but in other ways too. 

I want to add that it’s discriminatory + ridiculous to populate our ideas about space and who has “the right stuff” with only nondisabled people. The fact is that some disabled people may have an edge as space travellers — and what our bodies will need to do and become in space is far from the niche requirements set here on Earth. Even if we start out nondisabled and recruit for peak abledness, the toll of space on human bodies will bring about disabilities we have yet to imagine. Considering the future of space travel in any serious way requires thinking about being and becoming disabled, about accepting disability as a normal part of life – one that will follow us to the stars.

 

*’Cripborgs’ is a great term used by Bethany Stevens. Mallory Kay Nelson, Bethany Stevens, and I have a publication talking about that term (and others) that will come out Spring 2019 in Catalyst.

Tech & Dis research in the news

Virginia Tech’s College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences has featured a story about the NSF CAREER grant associated with Tech & Dis on their website this week:

Headline: NSF Award into Research into Technologies for Disability Community

So happy to have this shared with the community. Over the next 5 years, I will have a rotating group of student researchers engaged in work on disability narrative, tech pedagogy, and telling better stories about technology and disability.